This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures

From: Javier Serrano Polo <javier at jasp dot net>
To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 22:34:18 +0100
Subject: Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <1517756479.29018.96.camel@sempati.menos4> <CAKCAbMiO=_0VBy-E3dgmDkxQjH+U2hetbWi1rnQWNn5cqta4HA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802051802490.4209@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAKCAbMgaMQperNPVP+2D_31gTSB5rYnqXbD3fWRvE+_NYxy_9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: javier--CbphpPOVok9WFxGWvC7CbkqlsxDZyT at jasp dot net

El dl 05 de 02 de 2018 a les 15:03 -0500, Zack Weinberg va escriure:
> It would probably be best to get binutils support
> completely upstreamed before doing anything with glibc.

I believe the change in glibc is independent. Anyway, current patch for
binutils (129_multiarch_libpath.patch) does not look ready to go
upstream.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

References:
- Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
  - From: Javier Serrano Polo
- Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]