This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: aarch64 crash with static PIE


* Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> [2018-01-19 12:09:53 -0800]:
> On 01/19/2018 11:48 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 01/19/2018 08:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> Not sure what is going on.  This is with:
> >>>
> >>> binutils-2.29.1-12.fc28.aarch64
> > 
> >> Don't you need binutils 2.30?
> > 
> > Our installation instructions do not mention a specific binutils
> > requirement.
> This was an oversight on my part. We should document this in NEWS
> along with the statement of support. It will be different from the
> INSTALL requirement for building the project with default configure
> options. We could extend configure tests to cover this, but I think
> it's excessive since a given version of binutils is not what matters,
> but instead the individual capabilities that need bug fixes which
> may be backported by vendors.
> 

that's why i was hesitant to update the news..
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-12/msg00555.html

it currently says gcc-8 and does not mention binutils,
even on x86 there is a minimum binutils requirement
for this to work, on aarch64 the requirement is just
higher: at least the fixes for ld/22263 and ld/22269
are required which are in 2.30 now.

i didnt write configure tests for the bugs thinking
this is an experimental feature, may be i should have..


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]