Re: [PATCH][BZ #11787] Fix stack guard size accounting

[Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>]

On 01/08/2018 04:41 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> i knew __pthread_get_minstack was used outside of glibc
> but thought removing the guardsize was safe since we
> add it back later.

I agree that the patch as posted should be safe because the return value 
of __pthread_get_minstack does not change.

However, renaming the function would trigger the Rust default 
implementation, which is PTHREAD_STACK_MIN, and that doesn't take the 
static TLS size into account.  This is why I think we shouldn't do the 
renaming right now.

Thanks,
Florian