[PING^3][PATCH v10 0/5][BZ 10871] Month names in alternative grammatical case

[Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com>]

6.12.2017 23:32 Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> wrote:
>
> 30.11.2017 12:37 Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> wrote:
> >
> > 16.11.2017 12:43 Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the 10th version of my patches, this time with a hope that
> > > it may be the final version, hence no more "RFC" tag in the subject.
> > > But, of course, the review is still needed.
> > >
> > > Changes since the previous version (v9):
> > >
> > > * The first patch of the series has been considered complete and
> > > loosely related with the rest therefore has been accepted and
> > > pushed to stable. [1]
> > > * Commit messages corrected.
> > > * ChangeLog changes removed (temporarily, actually moved to other
> > > patches which are not published here).
> > > * Fixed bug in strptime(), thanks Zack Weinberg for finding and
> > > fixing it.
> > > * Order of matching the month names in strptime() is consequent:
> > > basic month name, abbreviated, alternative, abbreviated alternative.
> > > * Some tests for strptime() added.
> > > * Everything rebased to the current (oh, sorry, yesterday's) master.
> > >
> > > This series publishes the patches 1, 3, and 5. These patches are skipped:
> > >
> > > 0002 Regenerate locfile-kw.h + ChangeLog to the previous commit (bug
> > > 10871).
> > > 0004 Again regenerate locfile-kw.h + ChangeLog to the previous commit (bug
> > > 10871).
> > >
> > > They contain the changes to the automatically generated files and
> > > should be eventually merged into the patches 1 and 3, respectively,
> > > before pushing to the git repo but should not be reviewed here.
> > > For those who want to examine, they are available in bugzilla [2]
> > > and my github repo. [3] Also note that in order to actually see
> > > any difference you also need the locale data which are not here
> > > but also in bugzilla and github. Unfortunately, my COPR repo [4]
> > > is not updated this time, this means that the packages in the main
> > > Fedora repositories are more recent and will overwrite my packages.
> > >
> > > Again, note that the backward compatibility patches which may be
> > > still around most probably will be rejected.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rafal
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=f301e53
> > > [2] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10871
> > > [3] https://github.com/rluzynski/glibc
> > > [4] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rluzynski/genitive/
> >
> > PING - any feedback about it? Currently my biggest concern is the
> > documentation, changelog and commit messages. I hope that the
> > code itself is correct (but a review is still welcome).
> >
> > Also I'd like to notify that we have discussed this with the Polish
> > translator and the Polish locale [5] [6] will be updated with
> > alternative month names as soon as these patches are pushed.
> > For other locales at least I'd like to try to contact translators.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rafal
> >
> >
> > [5] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10871#c119
> > [6] https://github.com/rluzynski/glibc/blob/master/localedata/locales/pl_PL
>
> PING^2 - actually I have nothing more to say about it. Shortly,
> my biggest concern now is the documentation. Also I'm trying to
> keep my github fork [3] up to date rebasing against the recent
> changes in locale data.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rafal

PING^3. It's been a month since I've stopped working on this and
about 1.5 month since I have received any feedback. Can we please
finish this reasonably long before the end of this development cycle?

Regards,

Rafal