This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [RFC] nptl: change default stack guard size of threads
* Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> [2017-11-29 22:02:48 +0100]:
> On 11/29/2017 09:51 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> > Hm? What are you thinking of that GCC might have gotten wrong?
>
> Use 64 KiB probe intervals (almost) everywhere as an optimization. I
> assumed the original RFC patch was motivated by that.
>
> I knew that ARM would be broken because that's what the gcc ARM maintainers
> want. I assumed that it was restricted to that, but now I'm worried that
> it's not.
no,
it was just much easier to post the patch without setting a
value for each target separately, i believe that larger guard
is useful on all 64bit targets, but to make the patch depend
on __WORDSIZE is also wrong since i knew i'd need different
setting for aarch64 ilp32