This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Introduce en_EU?


18.08.2017 11:11 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/17/2017 11:35 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > 10.08.2017 14:43 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 08/08/2017 09:12 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>> With all due respect, I can't see any reason why _DK was chosen
> >>> to represent a generic continental European English locale.
> >>
> >> It predates the EU and the ISO reservation.
> >>
> >>> If such locale is actually needed, shouldn't we introduce en_EU
> >>> instead? _EU can be understood either as Europe or as European
> >>> Union, both could be assumed valid.
> >>
> >> ISO writes this about “EU”:
> >>
> >> “Refers to European Union and reserved at the request of ISO 4217/MA
> >> (March 1998) for ISO 6166, Securities - International securities
> >> identification numbering system (ISIN).”
> >>
> >> (See <https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/> under Country codes/Other
> >> codes/Exceptionally reserved.)
> >
> > Looks good. If I understand correctly, your opinion about my idea
> > is "rather yes".
>
> Yes, I think using EU in locale identifiers makes sense.

Filed here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473

Regards,

Rafal


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]