This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [RFC 4/6] ARC: Initial port to glibc
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet dot Gupta1 at synopsys dot com>
- Cc: "libc-alpha @ sourceware . org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, <linux-snps-arc at lists dot infradead dot org>, <Cupertino dot Miranda at synopsys dot com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 22:26:52 +0000
- Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] ARC: Initial port to glibc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1498550454-3560-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1498550454-3560-5-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706271147470.17677@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <71bc62c1-11bd-d1a7-c78c-5cc2d166f682@synopsys.com>
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Revisiting glibc upstreaming for ARC. I was told that the lawyers did their
> "foo". Do you have the copyright assignment from Synopsys already - or do you
> want me to send it to you (privately perhaps)
I can confirm the assignment is listed in copyright.list.
> glibc has obviously moved on since our initial submission. What branch / tag
> shall I rebase off of. This also has a bearing on minimum symbol version,
> which per the last comment on the list was changed to 2.26 across the port !
New port submissions should be based on master, and use the next release's
version as minimum symbol version (so GLIBC_2.27 minimum symbol version at
present).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com