This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Any reason ARM doesn't implement sysconf.c?
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
- Cc: nd at arm dot com
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 10:07:22 -0700
- Subject: Re: Any reason ARM doesn't implement sysconf.c?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <67de1654-4545-1fde-e036-29a671ef731f@redhat.com> <bd02b6c0-a9ab-a975-a2c0-6f6baf9fe1a9@gotplt.org> <02882f8f-1dd5-14ea-7434-e024b23f66ed@redhat.com> <59FC9CAE.5040606@arm.com>
On 11/03/2017 09:43 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 01/11/17 06:26, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 10/31/2017 11:22 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 31 October 2017 09:00 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>>> Is there any reason ARM doesn't implement sysconf.c? Too much
>>>> hardware variance?
>>>>
>>>> We've had at least a few user reports over the last year that
>>>> things like sysconf (_SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_SIZE); would be useful
>>>> to have.
>>>
>>> Funnily enough, I documented the sysconf quirk and committed it[1]
>>> assuming that Richard had already committed his patch.
>>
>> I expect that Szabolcs or Richard should checkin the patch.
>>
>> We can wait a while for Richard to respond.
>>
>
> i committed it.
Thanks, that works!
--
Cheers,
Carlos.