This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use C11 _Alignas on scratch_buffer internal buffer

From: Paul Eggert <eggert at cs dot ucla dot edu>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:57:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use C11 _Alignas on scratch_buffer internal buffer
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <1505745774-29303-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <1505745774-29303-2-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <0f162389-e84d-3168-35eb-f168484e87ee@cs.ucla.edu> <da92fb1c-9144-f2ee-b23c-1e98d88a63ef@redhat.com>

Florian Weimer wrote:

Are you sure?  sizeof (max_align_t) is 48 on i386, after all.

Sorry, didn't know that. We could use 1056-byte buffers instead; would that bethe same on all glibc platforms? I'm not sure how important it is that the bytecount be the same everywhere.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use C11 _Alignas on scratch_buffer internal buffer
  - From: Florian Weimer

References:
- [PATCH v2 1/2] posix: Add compat glob symbol to not follow dangling symbols
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- [PATCH 2/2] Use C11 _Alignas on scratch_buffer internal buffer
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use C11 _Alignas on scratch_buffer internal buffer
  - From: Paul Eggert
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use C11 _Alignas on scratch_buffer internal buffer
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]