This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Fix build without NO_HIDDEN
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org>
- To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 23:56:19 +0200
- Subject: Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Fix build without NO_HIDDEN
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20170911233614.26389-1-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> <b8150e05-2d78-ca6f-fcf4-667f1f390485@linaro.org> <20170912203634.c7qp4pcgeaawekhh@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <20cd52f7-eb01-2712-5909-1d724a874535@linaro.org>
Adhemerval Zanella, on mar. 12 sept. 2017 18:51:08 -0300, wrote:
> On 12/09/2017 17:36, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Adhemerval Zanella, on mar. 12 sept. 2017 17:34:51 -0300, wrote:
> >> Samuel, since you spent time in a lot of patches to fix Hurd build,
> >> wouldn't be better if you could add hurd build support on
> >> build-many-glibcs.py?
> >
> > Unfortunately, we are still far from having something buildable. I'm
> > here just keeping up with the newer versions, but there are patches
> > needed (e.g. for TLS) which are not included yet and need care.
>
> So currently you can't really build glibc master for hurd, is it
> correct?
Yes, some patches are needed.
> >> I do not know if it is possible to cross-compiling hurd on Linux,
> >
> > It is, but that needs a cross-toolchain which is really not trivial :)
>
> Right, but how currently are you actually testing your changes?
I test with the additional needed patches in. They usually don't
interfere with the changes. If they do, then they get queue behind
those missing patches.
> Do we need an old dated toolchain?
No, we use current binutils & gcc-6 etc. (probably gcc-7 will be fine,
it was just not tested yet in Debian).
> >> but I think at least a native build could be useful so generic changes
> >> could be checked against Hurd as well.
> >
> > Yep, ideally :)
>
> PS: I am CC'ing libc-alpha because it was my initial intent.
Ok :)
samuel