This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix sysconf support for cache geometries
On 16/06/2017 10:36, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> Adhemerval Zanella <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> [ text/plain ]
>> On 16/06/2017 09:00, Paul Clarke wrote:
>>> On 06/15/2017 03:55 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>>> On 15/06/2017 17:45, Paul Clarke wrote:
>>>>> Commit cdfbe5037f2f67bf5f560b73732b69d0fabe2314 added sysconf support
>>>>> for cache geometries on powerpc, but mishandled errno. For valid input
>>>>> parameters, sysconf() should not set errno.
>>>> Do we have a testcase for it? If not I think we should add it.
>>> We don't. There are three obvious test cases for sysconf:
>>> - ./nptl/tst-sysconf.c: ignores errno
>>> - ./posix/tst-sysconf.c: ignores errno
>>> - ./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/tst-sysconf.c
>>> Ironically (given the need for the subject patch), this correctly tests for errno changes but only for the _SC_LEVEL*, and only for powerpc.
>> I think you might have a staged change in your repo, I do not see
>> the powerpc specific one in master. In any case, I think it worth
>> to add some errno testing on nptl and posix tests (maybe even
>> incorporate nptl on posix) and add powerpc one (be aware to avoid
>> add a testcase with same name in same folder, as this powerpc seems
>> to be doing).
> I guess Paul meant to say
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/test-powerpc-linux-sysconf.c, which is the
> new name of the test after solving the name clash issue. ;-)
Right, so that's the one that caused some trouble in the past. We can use
this file to add a regression test then.