This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 01/13] posix: Consolidate Linux pause syscall



On 12/05/2017 15:15, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 07:58 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> +/* sparc64 defines __NR_pause,  however it is not supported (ENOSYS).
>> +   Undefine so pause.c can use a correct alternative.  */
>> +# ifdef __NR_pause
>> +#  undef __NR_pause
>> +# endif
> 
> I think you can #undef unconditionally, there isn't a warning for that.

Alright, I will change it.

> 
> +  return SYSCALL_CANCEL (ppoll, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> 
> I think some of the arguments should be NULL instead of 0.

I will change to SYSCALL_CANCEL (ppoll, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL).

> 
> I'm not completely sure if an empty ppoll without a timeout has the required semantics, but I can't think of a reason why it would not work.

I though about Linux syscall with similar semantics regarding signals,
but I couldn't find one.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]