This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Erase GLIBC_TUNABLES for setxid processes when tunables is disabled


On Tuesday 31 January 2017 06:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 06:11 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>> In addition to this, I'll post a patch for earlier releases (2.24 and
>> older) to add GLIBC_TUNABLES to unsecure_envvars (is unsecure even a
>> word?) so that they too don't end up passing on unsafe tunables.
> 
> I expected a patch with a preprocessor condition for unsecvars.h for
> glibc 2.25.  Wouldn't this have the same effect than your tunables-based
> changes?

It would, but I chose to limit the change to within the tunables code
base.  I can do it your way if that's your preference.

Siddhesh


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]