This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Tunables-related security regression
- From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:59:28 +0530
- Subject: Re: Tunables-related security regression
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <e9cbe93c-e788-f67c-bfce-4c8feda220e0@redhat.com> <CAKCAbMh71Ahe9Dve1w=MqwKYUS18HCtfoBiNmoyukb-omPOJVQ@mail.gmail.com> <bf8181fd-a653-22fd-e4be-84501810536b@gotplt.org> <CAKCAbMiuro-DNHW1E3Qwq-Xu1yY62=v7Q97LsdUN4JF935zv5Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday 23 January 2017 08:29 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org> wrote:
>> - all of the other MALLOC_* envvars
>
> by which I think you mean "all of the MALLOC_* envvars except MALLOC_TRACE"?
>
Yes. Tunables does not control MALLOC_TRACE behaviour right now.
> That's where I am right now.
I will post another patch (on top of my fix) to propose this behaviour
change. It may not make 2.25 but we could still discuss it.
Siddhesh