This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Update copyright dates not handled by scripts/update-copyrights [committed]


On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Torvald Riegel wrote:

> On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 04:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > even better: let's delete them and be done.
> 
> Yes, please.

The old logs are routinely useful for identifying the logical changesets 
for changes before the move to git.

The newer logs are a matter of the GNU Coding Standards.  That is, if you 
don't want to maintain information about "what" changed in that particular 
form, you should be persuading the GCS maintainers to allow just logging 
descriptions of what and why changed at the logical level rather than the 
level of individual files and functions (in the case where a version 
control system provides tracking of the "what" ... not all GNU packages 
have public version control).  Absent such a GCS change, we can still move 
to automatic generation but that requires various infrastructure work such 
as I outlined.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]