This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Lessons learned from compiler error/warnings tests

On 09/09/2016 04:13 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 14:28 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
For compile-time fortify checks (such as the wrappers for type-safe
open/openat), we need to add tests in glibc which examine the
output for warnings and errors.

I do not want to add Dejagnu as a dependency to the glibc test suite,
but I wonder if you could share any lessons learned from the testing
support facility in GCC.

Would you suggest to mirror the GCC directives exactly?

I probably have to implement the testing directive parser as a small

Is Python acceptable as a dependency for the test suite?

I doubt it.  We use Perl and awk so far.

String parsing is likely to be saner in Python than in C, especially when the
requirements grow over time.

For a lexer, I'm not sure if this is true. The core loop will look almost identical (at least if you somehow fake enums in Python).

I looked at doing this in awk, but it gets fairly messy soon.

(FWIW, I'd much prefer it if DejaGnu were implemented in Python rather
than Tcl; writing and debugging .exp files below gcc/testsuite is one
of my least favorite activities in gcc development; we have all kinds
of nasty kludges involving global variables, peeking at names in the
stack frames above us, and other fragile coding practices.  Some of
this may be to do with Tcl, and some to do with legacy code, I guess).

I'm sure you can write in this style even Python. :)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]