This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0/4] explicit_bzero, this time for sure


On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/06/2016 07:11 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:
>>> Now that we're in full swing on 2.25 (and I'm not trying to hit a
>>> conference deadline), here is an updated version of the explicit_bzero
>>> patchset.
>>
>> Ping.
>
> I think the consensus evolved that we want an explict_bzero and
> __explicit_bzero_chk in libc, not just the inline wrapper.

Yes, but that is essentially the way the patch already is!  I can
reshuffle it to make that clearer but I would like to know whether
there's anything else that needs fixing first.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]