This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Good mailing list to use to send out test results to


On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 00:44 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> FAIL: malloc/tst-malloc-thread-exit
> >> FAIL: malloc/tst-malloc-thread-fail
> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-cond16
> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-cond17
> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-cond20
> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-dlsym1
> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-robust8
> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-robustpi8
> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-rwlock16
> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-sem14
> >> FAIL: nptl/tst-stack4
> >> FAIL: rt/tst-mqueue6
> 
> tst-cond16: pthread_mutex_lock.c:81: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion
> `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed.
> This non-math ones could be an issue with the ARMv8.1 LSE extensions
> (I have to look to see if it is that or hw issue).
> I will run one test without LSE to see if I get a failures there too.

That would be good.  My gut feeling would be that there's something
wrong on levels lower than the sync data structures (eg, atomics
implementation).  I'm pretty sure the semaphore implementation works
correctly provided our C11 atomics are implemented correctly.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]