This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PING][PATCH v9] Add pretty printers for the NPTL lock types


On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
<siddhesh@sourceware.org> wrote:
> You'll need to create a separate set of rules (and hence, variables,
> say, tests-pp) for these tests in Rules.  That way you don't touch the
> existing tests framework and you also have a way to completely disable
> the rule if your checks for gdb, pexpect, etc. versions fail.

How would that solve the tests-need-hardcoded-path issue? Could you
give me more details as to exactly what changes would I have to make
in Rules?

I didn't understand the "disable the rule" part. These checks will be
made in runtime.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]