This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 07/05/2016 06:48 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
On 24 Jun 2016, Florian Weimer said:On 06/07/2016 01:06 PM, Nix wrote:When dynamically linking, ifunc resolvers are called before TLS is initialized, so they cannot be safely stack-protected.You should base this on top of Stefan Liebler's IFUNC resolver cleanups. It should be a one-liner then.Hm. OK, I'll rebase the series atop that, once I can figure out which patches to use :) (or would you rather I pull those patches into my patch series and not rebase it? I'm happy to do either, or rebase atop master: I'll have to retest in any case, so the usual arguments against rebases don't apply, and the testing is almost entirely automated so I don't mind having to rerun it.)
My intention was to suggest to rebase your series on master after the IFUNC patches are in.
Unfortunately, this means that the stack-protector changes will not be part of glibc 2.24, but Adhemerval already rejected the stack-protector changes as such.
Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |