This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.24 --- Starting soft/slush freeze discussion
- From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 12:24:46 -0300
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.24 --- Starting soft/slush freeze discussion
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <57757DBB.2060404@linaro.org> <CAKCAbMgB7-AjJ1uir8UUFsapaawQ2qNBbi1FBrQu+BGQP1Pa5w@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/07/2016 09:52, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Adhemerval Zanella
> <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> I will spend some time tomorrow compiling the release blockers for 2.24, so
>> please use this thread as placeholder to discuss them. I would like to
>> have them defined by the end of tomorrow.
>
> It occurs to me that Thorsten's sunrpc patches really ought to get
> into this release:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-04/msg00123.html
This seems to ok and I think we should also open a bugzilla for this.
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-04/msg00044.html
>
I do not have much experience with libnsl/libnss neither the second iteration
of the patch got any review [1]. So I would like to hear for some other
developer that if we should add it as blocker or push to 2.25.
[1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-04/msg00078.html