This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Tunables for glibc
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 12:32:03 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Tunables for glibc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1467397878-11514-1-git-send-email-siddhesh at sourceware dot org> <CAMe9rOoo0QFC58ULqwBiDMQPYvRDTTE+AcBhFYJEKj9Wbwy33w at mail dot gmail dot com> <20160701192928 dot GH7564 at devel dot intra dot reserved-bit dot com>
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
<siddhesh@sourceware.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 12:20:11PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> I may have missed something. Do you include some testcases in your
>> patches? Does this frame work support static executables? If yes, how
>> does it work with static executables?
>
> I had not tested with static and it looks like it won't work with
In this case, it can't be used for GLIBC_IFUNC since ifunc enable/disable
should work with both dynamic and static executables.
> static executables because the tunables_list won't get initialized.
> I've been verifying with some of the malloc tests that set
> MALLOC_CHECK_ but they're dynamic. Thanks for catching that, I'll
> send an updated patch.
>
> Siddhesh
--
H.J.