This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 21 Jun 2016 19:31, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes: > > Does compatibility really matter? I thought you need exactly matching > > libpthread and libthread_db versions anyway. I suppose we could even > > compile the offsets into libthread_db. > > The thread_db interface appears to be generic enough to be able to cope > with different versions. while true, i don't think that means you can mix & match. we've always said glibc libs must be coherent (can't mix 2.15 libpthread with a 2.17 libc), so i'm not sure why thread_db is any different. they're shipped together by distros too. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |