This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 25 May 2016 15:36, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 24 May 2016, Matt Turner wrote: > > - else > > - { > > - if (j0 == 0x400) > > - /* x is inf or NaN. */ > > - return x + x; > > - } > > You're removing too much code here. You need to keep this addition in the > NaN case to ensure that signaling NaNs raise "invalid" and get converted > to quiet NaNs in the process. does this mean current test coverage is insufficient ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |