This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 14/17 v5] Avoid stack-protecting signal-handling functions sibcalled from assembly.
- From: Nix <nix at esperi dot org dot uk>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 16:18:39 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17 v5] Avoid stack-protecting signal-handling functions sibcalled from assembly.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1457882222-22599-1-git-send-email-nix at esperi dot org dot uk> <1457882222-22599-15-git-send-email-nix at esperi dot org dot uk> <3a1025f2-8b0e-5d9b-01c4-7b4e4ef62cc8 at redhat dot com> <87r3d3odkd dot fsf at esperi dot org dot uk> <87r3d38v88 dot fsf at linux-m68k dot org>
On 15 May 2016, Andreas Schwab verbalised:
> Nix <email@example.com> writes:
>> I'll have a hunt for whatever it is that's causing sigjmp.c to not be
>> rebuilt after this test cycle, because that's the underlying bug here,
> Just changing CFLAGS-foo doesn't trigger a rebuild of dependent objects.
Well, no, but sigjmp.c should be rebuilt if it's incorporated in ld.so
anyway: we should be getting an rtld-sigjmp.o, and we're not.
(However, I suspect that this is because it's *not* incorporated into
ld.so, and I was misreading the code! So this is all rather moot.
Everything seems to be going fine so far on the testing front with the
CFLAGS-set for sigjmp.c removed...)
NULL && (void)