This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2] Remove union wait


On 03/31/2016 09:14 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> On 03/30/2016 06:32 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>>> I think the blocker here is clear consensus that a one-cycle removal of a
>>> feature from the API without any broadcasted deprecation period is OK.
>>> I'd like some other senior maintainers to explicitly agree with that before
>>> we go ahead based just on the direct review of the change itself.
>>
>> IMO a one-cycle removal is OK IFF a distribution has gone through a full build
>> cycle with the deprecation patch applied and found no serious problems in the
>> existing corpus of package sources.
> 
> I've now set up
> <https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:Andreas_Schwab:glibc> to
> rebuild all packages from
> <https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Factory:Rings:1-MinimalX>
> against a patched glibc.  The latter project contains the packages that
> we use for testing all updates for our openSUSE Tumbleweed distribution.
> You can monitor progress at
> <https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor/home:Andreas_Schwab:glibc>.

Nice piece of technology. :)  Thanks for doing this.

Somehow, the earlier tcsh build failure I saw on the monitor page is
gone.  tcsh has a __GLIBC__ feature check, and should avoid using union
wait there, but the macro is probably checked without including
<features.h>, so __GLIBC__ is not defined.

The other build failures where due to the readdir_r deprecation.

Florian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]