This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
RE: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- From: "Pawar, Amit" <Amit dot Pawar at amd dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:19:24 +0000
- Subject: RE: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=amd.com;
- References: <SN1PR12MB073325E2FB320E3CECD22660978B0 at SN1PR12MB0733 dot namprd12 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <CAMe9rOo_pgS7Vh1+JGWiYbHr3yXZmRDpxaLX6Xs9dzHr-TSH1A at mail dot gmail dot com> <SN1PR12MB0733B252EEDF7DE08EE91AF9978B0 at SN1PR12MB0733 dot namprd12 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <CAMe9rOqhAUNhvD0=FZm23MDeVMRaYrnkZ51wWB1O4JRu8o2ywg at mail dot gmail dot com> <SN1PR12MB07332500CE527AA6EAC1C360978C0 at SN1PR12MB0733 dot namprd12 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <CAMe9rOqGKGsWHsM1NO7L46QdtMALoG_Wq3mahg=beWSesAg0jg at mail dot gmail dot com> <SN1PR12MB0733A07FB69B2EC3831FB091978C0 at SN1PR12MB0733 dot namprd12 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <CAMe9rOoYXJQWB_T0SOM9+vj38yTndYknBZyjU3MbdAyc9x+g8A at mail dot gmail dot com> <SN1PR12MB0733522F9520520B45459C24978C0 at SN1PR12MB0733 dot namprd12 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <CAMe9rOqpbUF2m40pxjyr+O8pSrA9EmUgNsOcBPuP-wDaMqn+RQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOr11s9j7i4Gk2yozXY-MWJLKpFXCKkFqoLW553tyJ4LZg at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
>One question. If you don't want __memcpy_avx_unaligned, why do you set AVX_Fast_Unaligned_Load?
Any idea whether currently any other string and memory functions are under implementation based on this? If not then let me just verify it.
Also this feature is enabled in generic code. To disable it, need to change after this.
--Amit Pawar
- References:
- [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- RE: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- RE: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- RE: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- RE: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583
- Re: [PATCH x86_64] Update memcpy, mempcpy and memmove selection order for Excavator CPU BZ #19583