This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 22 Feb 2016 10:14, Andreas Schwab wrote: > If you cannot even be bothered to do a 10 second research on the meaning why don't you take 10 seconds to read the posts in this thread that have details and aren't focused on the distraction of your posting style. > of ayc I have to question your qualification to work on any locale data > updates. i'm more than happy to let other people step up and post updates to the locale data. however, no one, including yourself, is doing that. your git log in this area has ~10 commits over the last 17 years, and most are 1 or 2 line changes. as for qualifications, that is the whole point of peer review. you can you can just as easily look at the patches that are posted to the list as anyone else here. i've even broken them down into tiny deltas so it is easy to scan them at a glance rather than doing full rewrites of all the files. if you think they're garbage, then feel free to say so *with supporting details*. note: i'm not belittling the contributions people have made to locales or suggesting that some areas of work are more important than others (and thus one person's contributions are "worth more"). i think we can all agree that the locale area has been neglected for some time and has been underserving our users. 2013 had a bunch of good updates by Chris, but 2014 saw 3 changes in total, and 2015 was mostly unicode update by way of scripted imports. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |