This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] BZ #19590: Fixed build of shared objects that use libmvec.so functions
- From: Andrew Senkevich <andrew dot n dot senkevich at gmail dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:30:15 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] BZ #19590: Fixed build of shared objects that use libmvec.so functions
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMXFM3tML81iuKQMKRU-T4Fw0+=sYk0q_BNavMGagt21VcYvzQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOp7BF2avdWbGTbsxuYQV_rmXSxzDUAwz+nHK-GhWqPKJA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMXFM3sG90jn3Em-REfaqtj3OGAjh51OcO=yn1qHqJ4aStkPrg at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1602111641250 dot 29940 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAMXFM3uxH=0DHnwikPjs2AobQ0kxOqKg+j=CuOWX=RLB_i8hxg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOoWy+hqiCOKqFx0nOFVRT_kBETJ5hYE+cY6pFWUke=tkw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMXFM3vG1DNELfGaOOoUvRDGgrGWL4m3M8+5ngPg8RPnCLqUog at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1602161347240 dot 26462 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAMXFM3tXQi0wRFNN1gyu-T3C7g_EWPxMfhK4wexADGtcPojNZg at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1602171711080 dot 18373 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAMXFM3uYod=-mzjLnntwjtu5mAc3bt=pzSk6G7FiO_JHtpvTZQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1602171842400 dot 18373 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
2016-02-17 21:44 GMT+03:00 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>
>> Is attached version finally Ok for trunk?
>
> Please resubmit, with the coding style issues fixed and tests moved to
> test-skeleton.c unless there's a reason they can't use it, after the
> freeze is over. This is much too risky to consider during the freeze, and
> would need to wait a while on master before any backports could be
> considered (e.g. the new tests could break the testsuite build in some
> configurations for unforeseen reasons).
May be separate fix and tests to commit fix earlier?
--
WBR,
Andrew