This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 03/02/16 16:04 -0200, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
On 03-02-2016 15:40, Mike Frysinger wrote:On 03 Feb 2016 14:55, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:I will quote the email referenced:C++11 code using isinf and isnan continues to compile after that change, because the C++11 standard library provides its own versions conforming to the C++11 requirements. However, the C++11 library doesn't provide isinff, isinfl etc. and so code using those (non-standard) functions will no longer compile if they are not declared by glibc.This was not clear to me, what kind of build issue are you seeing now? Using isinf{f,l} by including just <cmath> along with C++11? If it is the case please open a bugzilla (or update the original) and please commit the fix.if the change hasn't seen a release yet, then we can just re-use the existing bug since it's really just a direct follow up to that ? -mikeI do not see why not.
Hi, what's the status of this then - do we need to add a testcase or can it be committed for 2.23? (or wait for 2.24?) FWIW it's already in the Fedora glibc 2.22 package.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |