This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Can we assume __thread support?
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- To: Samuel Thibault <samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org>
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:58:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: Can we assume __thread support?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <561FB294 dot 1010602 at redhat dot com> <CAMe9rOq9-oN_gdWReP6ZgCfLpj_SPzdOB7OqfGhJzdX2ryCBGw at mail dot gmail dot com> <561FBD81 dot 7060903 at redhat dot com> <20151015145653 dot GA28313 at var dot bordeaux dot inria dot fr>
On 10/15/2015 04:56 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Florian Weimer, le Thu 15 Oct 2015 16:51:45 +0200, a écrit :
>> This is mainly a Hurd/NaCl question anyway, the NPTL-based platforms
>> support it.
>
> Hurd supports it (since when Ulrich made it mandatory, basically).
This is good news, thanks. I will remove the weird
tsd_setspecific/tsd_getspecific macros and the infrastructure to support it.
Florian