This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Principles for syscall wrappers, again
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Rich Felker <dalias at libc dot org>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 16:38:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: Principles for syscall wrappers, again
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1505182114090 dot 16300 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20150519000918 dot GB17573 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <1432630525 dot 3077 dot 36 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <20150526151000 dot GA17573 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <mvmbnh78hly dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <20150526155258 dot GC17573 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <mvm382i8mm6 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <20150527141006 dot GL17573 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx>
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> writes:
> Sorry, I guess I wasn't clear; my point was just that inventing a new
> API has lots of requirements that might not be apparent at first, and
> that could easily be overlooked, whereas using the existing API is
> guaranteed not to be a regression.
Stopping development is guaranteed to not causing regressions.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."