This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: What does LAV_CURRENT mean backwards compatibility of LD_AUDIT interface?
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Ben Woodard <woodard at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:37:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: What does LAV_CURRENT mean backwards compatibility of LD_AUDIT interface?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <54EFBC96 dot 7010608 at redhat dot com> <5507BE70 dot 4090800 at redhat dot com> <20150318215629 dot 2BA1D2C3B30 at topped-with-meat dot com>
On 03/18/2015 05:56 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> In this discussion nobody said anything about investigating the Solaris
> interface and figuring out what the versioning/compatibility principles
> there are. That is the first thing to do before making any decisions.
That's because I'm an idiot. You raise a good point.
I've started by reaching out to Ali Bahrami, the only Solaris person I know
that works on core OS and might be able to answer that question (I used to
read Ali's blog).
Does anyone know anyone else at Oracle working on Solaris core OS that
might be able to answer this question?