This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, bug-gnulib at gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:37:40 +0530
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20150203145649 dot GG1528 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <54D0F799 dot 2030204 at redhat dot com> <20150203163831 dot GL1528 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <54D0FC16 dot 7090009 at redhat dot com> <20150203170511 dot GM1528 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <54D10FEE dot 4000307 at redhat dot com> <54D1101C dot 80902 at redhat dot com> <1423005918 dot 4947 dot 45 dot camel at bordewijk dot wildebeest dot org>

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:25:18AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> This sounds a bit like https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308427 "s390
> memcheck reports tsearch conditional jump or move depends on
> uninitialized value". But that bug got fixed some time ago and should
> not be in the latest version of valgrind. It does contain a nice
> description of how best to report such an issue.

I've filed:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343802

which is a variant of 308427, which fixes the lg+jhe combination, but
not the lt+jl combination which the newer gcc produces.

Siddhesh

Attachment: pgpBoAnlzPYHK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Initialize the entire obstack struct [BZ #17919]
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]