This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Seeking consensus on BZ 16734
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>
- Cc: GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Daniel Colascione <dancol at dancol dot org>
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 20:09:29 -0800
- Subject: Re: Seeking consensus on BZ 16734
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CALoOobP_7jpdZUqSFmKCTFds6t8TTdnxfOfg2jCTr_TjvU+t2w at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The arguments in
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16734
>
> and in threads linked from it:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-11/msg00061.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-11/msg00064.html
>
> seem pretty convincing to me. It was probably a good idea to do it in
> 2006, and it seems an even better idea now that everything is
> multithreaded.
>
> Can we just do it?
>
Do we have any current performance data on this?
--
H.J.