This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: protected data in a DSO with copy relocation
- From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:12:04 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: protected data in a DSO with copy relocation
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <54919EB5 dot 5030209 at redhat dot com> <CAMe9rOrGcuMQ3J9iNwKvZ-H9irdqjataJzt1+Auck5_q6sOCNA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20141217225330 dot 375CB2C3ACD at topped-with-meat dot com> <CAMe9rOoA2a2rXjnNxZXoQ7yuRPGzgi7mC370TZuDGmfyLycR1A at mail dot gmail dot com> <20141217233547 dot 948F52C3ABF at topped-with-meat dot com> <CAMe9rOp8Dwe-7e54b4jCwzQOW_7vjnpkkLj0DP1BMrC4WZnzYA at mail dot gmail dot com>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Roland McGrath <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> If we punt, we need to update the elf/vismain test which fails with
> >> the current ld.
> > In what version did ld's behavior change? Why should it not be considered
> It will be binutils 2.26.
glibc 2.22 will be released before binutils 2.26, so I don't think it's
an immediate concern that the binutils trunk is in a dubious state for
building glibc 2.21. We'll harmonize the binutils behavior and the
glibc expectations one way or another shortly after the 2.21 release.