This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [Patch] Add .size directives to x86_64 start.S, and possibly more
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Sterling Augustine <saugustine at google dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, carlos at redhat dot org
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:50:53 -0800
- Subject: Re: [Patch] Add .size directives to x86_64 start.S, and possibly more
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAEG7qUyQPNG1EtSwWSC77vUm+PZXUpDBtm5obab+Y5aa9Vv4-A at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOq+bKtiJaAfa5sxx-PjiHLutdYBT1p=7K24KPcoB0pbug at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAEG7qUzM070Va4L1N=msw8t5uAFRp2WQmUryULen+99_zWpbKw at mail dot gmail dot com> <8761e8coo3 dot fsf at igel dot home> <CAEG7qUy-GJKtrdgz6ZYK5dx4P5E=yBWKrq-YGF3keS-zoMGiyg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Sterling Augustine
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Andreas Schwab <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Sterling Augustine <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>> I'm hazy here, but I don't think things are sufficiently initialized
>>> by _start to call mcount, which ENTRY does.
>> start doesn't have a .po variant, so it doesn't matter.
> So should I follow HJ's approach, or just use an plain ENTRY macro?
Plain ENTRY is preferred if it works.