This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH RFC] Add support for linux memfd_create syscall
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: David Herrmann <dh dot herrmann at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:30:21 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Add support for linux memfd_create syscall
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1413537694-30556-1-git-send-email-dh dot herrmann at gmail dot com> <546F808C dot 1070801 at redhat dot com> <CANq1E4SU0sJ8m--rFXUja=p5AzNVJEu1ApcqhpQv1ntwNrmdwQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, David Herrmann wrote:
> I remember someone telling me RedHat had a copyright agreement with
> the FSF, but the link explicitly states you need it from the _author_.
> I will send v2 as 2 patches, if you consider either a non-mechanical
> contribution, we will have to delay it until my copyright agreement
> with the FSF is done.
If there is a corporate assignment (as opposed to a corporate disclaimer)
then that suffices - but in that case it helps to post patches from the
relevant email address that makes it clear which assignment applies. In
this case I see:
ANY Red Hat, Inc. 1999-10-21
Assigns past and future changes to FSF software (until
agreement is terminated with 30 days notice).
which looks sufficient.
Joseph S. Myers