This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Remove arm lowlevellock.c
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Will Newton <will dot newton at linaro dot org>
- Cc: Bernie Ogden <bernie dot ogden at linaro dot org>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 15:16:00 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove arm lowlevellock.c
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CALE0ps2nxAqHeotsxVcBEOV+nRsFGLBLD8+kP2ZY-PdnELkueA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CANu=Dmjz96Nk-C0xWOdO-xDWzt=+Z7u6OrsYJehcB_Y0T7B=ag at mail dot gmail dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1404291523380 dot 6770 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CALE0ps2q-jXh+p-_70jG8EvyWSB39uBmy6N=kjfn2xihppi95w at mail dot gmail dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1404301546250 dot 30561 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CANu=Dmgn6LDkbZeAT0HM5Sp4kK54a45Ksgq_JxJGC09e=DTZTg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Will Newton wrote:
> On 30 April 2014 16:49, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Bernie Ogden wrote:
> >
> >> The workaround is that some of the arm lowlevellock.c functions
> >> promote futex to 2 if it is 1. Generic lowlevellock.c always promotes
> >> futex to 2. Hence, removing arm's lowlevellock.c doesn't cause a
> >> regression in this sense.
> >
> > Thanks. The original patch is OK.
>
> i applied this patch on Bernie's behalf.
Please remember when committing a patch that fixes a bug to update the
list of fixed bugs in NEWS and to close the bug in Bugzilla.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com