This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Updated rwlock-in-C patchkit
- From: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>, OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:12:19 -0700
- Subject: Re: Updated rwlock-in-C patchkit
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1395789863-5026-1-git-send-email-andi at firstfloor dot org> <1397248605 dot 10643 dot 18269 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <53497694 dot 4040901 at redhat dot com> <20140412194007 dot GA1284 at domone dot podge> <1397402907 dot 10643 dot 19303 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <534B8B38 dot 8090402 at redhat dot com> <8761m9iekn dot fsf at tassilo dot jf dot intel dot com>
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> writes:
> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> That's right. I'd like to see the whatever code was used to benchmark
>> the performance submitted as a microbenchmark so I can run it myself
>> and verify. Again, it's not that I don't trust Andi, but an objective
>> evaluation is always going to be the best defense for these changes.
>
> Here is the code I used:
Any comments now? Is the code ok to commit now?
If yes please someone with access rights commit it.
Thanks,
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only