This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] S/390: xfail test POSIX/signal.h


On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Stefan Liebler wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> on S390x the conformance test conform/POSIX/signal.h/conform.out is failing,
> due to incorrect type.
> The member sa_flags in struct sigaction on s390x is defined
> as unsigned long instead of int due to the kernel struct.
> On other platforms, sa_flags is also unsigned long: ia64, sparc, hppa.

If you need to XFAIL such a test on an architecture-specific basis, the 
XFAIL should have a comment explaining why the test is expected to fail.

However, in this case I don't see the need to XFAIL it.  As far as I can 
tell, the upper bits of sa_flags aren't actually assigned.  So you should 
be able to change the structure so that sa_flags is int, with an adjacent 
padding field.  This would mean random padding is passed to the kernel in 
what the kernel thinks is the high part of the field, so you should either 
get kernel agreement that this is OK, or make glibc's sigaction 
implementation copy the structure and zero the padding.

(Again, file a bug in glibc Bugzilla before fixing it.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]