This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add test for pthread_setname_np and pthread_getname_np.


On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> diff --git a/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-setgetname.c b/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-setgetname.c
> index 2aceba5..0235d37 100644
> --- a/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-setgetname.c
> +++ b/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-setgetname.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,17 @@ do_test (int argc, char **argv)
>    if (res == 0)
>      {
>        res = get_self_comm (gettid (), name_check, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> +
> +      /* On this first test we look for ENOENT to be returned from
> +         get_self_comm to indicate that the kernel is older than
> +         2.6.33 and doesn't contain comm within the proc structure.
> +         In that case we skip the entire test.  */
> +      if (res == ENOENT)
> +       {
> +         printf ("SKIP: The kernel does not have /proc/self/task/%%lu/comm.\n");
> +         return 0;
> +       }

I'd like it to be obvious that this can be removed when we require kernel 
2.6.33 or later (maybe in a couple of years' time).  Could you condition 
this on __LINUX_KERNEL_VERSION < 0x020621, or (more cleanly) a 
corresponding __ASSUME_PROC_PID_TASK_COMM defined in kernel-features.h for 
__LINUX_KERNEL_VERSION >= 0x020621 (with an include of kernel-features.h 
in this test, of course)?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]