This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PING][BZ #15850] [GLIBC Patch v2] inet: avoid redefinition of some structs in kernel
- From: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- To: Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, Cong Wang <xiyou dot wangcong at gmail dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:48:48 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PING][BZ #15850] [GLIBC Patch v2] inet: avoid redefinition of some structs in kernel
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20131008184300 dot GA16773 at domone dot podge> <CAM_iQpWHtyPy7S8f6cmPMq0Kh=C46qvKbA6jyenu5OEAekCanA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131009051639 dot GA18785 at domone dot podge> <CAM_iQpWo6boW=aFxaay1FBzxRA9u-5UPuizjv1OF5Dg-RKVAcg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140111122000 dot GD20558 at domone dot podge> <52D13A7A dot 4040604 at archlinux dot org>
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:35:06PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 11/01/14 22:20, OndÅej BÃlka wrote:
> > Carlos,
> >
> > as we currently sync kernel/userspace header there is a patch that
> > should be merged. Is there a roadblock for that?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:37:22PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:16 PM, OndÅej BÃlka <neleai@seznam.cz> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:32:56PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:43 AM, OndÅej BÃlka <neleai@seznam.cz> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> Is kernel part ready so we could proceed?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> See following discussion about this patch.
> >>>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-08/msg00293.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, and I think the glibc part was already merged by Carlos too?
> >>>
> >>> It was but a bugzilla entry is still open. Could you close it?
> >>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15850
> >>
> >> It seems this patch still doesn't hit master branch, so I think
> >> we need to check this with Carlos first.
> >
>
> Is this not commit 6c82a2f8?
> "Coordinate IPv6 definitions for Linux and glibc"
>
Yes, I only checked that bug is still open, I am updating that.