This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday 10 December 2013 19:55:01 Allan McRae wrote: > For those who need some background, see [1]. In short, there is an > issue with __strstr_sse42 on x86 which has a variety of workarounds. > > I am going to propose we adopt the removal of the SSE42 routines. We > can not ensure that binaries are built with a new enough compiler (gcc > after 2000) and keep backwards compatibility. Also, ensuring the stack > is aligned when entering these functions would be a performance hit that > would likely remove any advantage of the sse42 routine (not tested...), i disagree. if your code is broken, then it's broken. this isn't sufficient reason imo to drop the code. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |