This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][v3] Add AARCH64 relocation constants to elf/elf.h


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Ryan S. Arnold <ryan.arnold@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Petr Machata <pmachata@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> PING
>>>
>>> The patch is at
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-09/msg00075.html
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> PM
>>
>> Hi Petr,
>>
>> I assume this is congruent with the relocation definitions/usage in
>> binutils and gold?
>>
>> Are all parties that are invested in the architecture using these
>> relocations?  From experience, you don't want to have relocation
>> number assignment overlaps with other competing implementations
>> (compilers and tools) if at all possible.
>
> These numbers are part of the official AARCH64 ABI SPEC on ARM's
> website.  So yes they are the same definitions/usage there.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski


Thanks Andrew,

Then I don't see any reason that these shouldn't go in.   I don't
think inclusion of these relocation definitions will trigger the
building of anything out of order.

Ryan S. Arnold


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]