This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: LC_ADDRESS and other locale updates [was: sr_ME locale country_isbn and int_prefix fix]


I looked at your first patch

Fill in country_{car,isbn} for aa_ET.

--- libc.orig/localedata/locales/aa_ET 2003-11-04 05:53:19.000000000 +0100
+++ libc/localedata/locales/aa_ET 2004-11-10 02:36:38.000000000 +0100
@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@
 country_ab2   "<U0045><U0054>"
 country_ab3   "<U0045><U0054><U0048>"
 country_num   231   % 210 found in at least one ISO 3166 doc
-% country_car   unknown
-% country_isbn  unknown, Need ISO 2108
+country_car   "<U0045><U0054><U0048>"
+country_isbn  "<U0039><U0039><U0039><U0034><U0034>"
 lang_name     "<U0051><U0061><U0066><U0061><U0072>"
 lang_ab       "<U0061><U0061>"
 lang_term     "<U0061><U0061><U0072>"


I am not 100% sure, but I was under the impression from looking at
other locales that country_isbn was a simple numeric value and not
quoted and converted into Unicode points.

Am I correct in this?

cjl


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Jakub Bogusz <qboosh@pld-linux.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:53:22AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 06/06/2013 04:14 AM, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:13:03PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> >> On 05/22/2013 10:41 PM, Chris Leonard wrote:
>> >>> This will probably be ignored on libc-locales, forwarding to
>> >>> libc-alpha for consideration.
>> >>
>> >> Chris,
>> >>
>> >> I saw this on libc-locales, but I'm up to my ears in other things.
>> >>
>> >> Are you able to review it and check it in? :-)
>> >>
>> >> If we are going to grow as a community we need to delegate work.
>> >
>> > Any progress on this patch?
>>
>> Not yet.
>>
>> Added it to the pending review list:
>> http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Pending%20Reviews
>>
>> > There probably should be also Latin version of sr_ME locale, as
>> > Latin is widely used in Montenegro (when I visited this country last
>> > year, it appeared to me that Latin is far more common than Cyrillic,
>> > but I don't have any official evidence for it).
>> >
>> > BTW: In PLD we have many country_car, country_isbn and similar fixes
>> > for other glibc locales. I could isolate some patches - what is the
>> > preferred way: one patch will all changes, many individual patches for
>> > each locale, or some blocks of them?
>>
>> Many individual patches for each locale is the easiest way to review them.
>
> I started the work to split the big patch, verify and update each change
> (few parts required it).
> Parts already processed can be seen at:
> http://qboosh.pl/glibc-locale-fixes/
> (glibc-locale_fixes.patch contains the remaining, unverified parts)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]