This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Regenerate x86 and x86_64 ulps
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jeroen <_jeroen_ at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 19:40:14 +0000
- Subject: Re: Regenerate x86 and x86_64 ulps
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1307022001020 dot 28677 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <1372836611 dot 94370 dot YahooMailNeo at web124504 dot mail dot ne1 dot yahoo dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1307031352210 dot 18167 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <1372879767 dot 86164 dot YahooMailNeo at web124506 dot mail dot ne1 dot yahoo dot com>
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Jeroen wrote:
> That makes sense. I have done 4 builds on an AMD FX-8350 with GCC 4.8.1.
> the targets are i686 and x86-64, each with 'generic' and 'native'
> compiler flags. The 4 diffs are listed with the respective C(XX)FLAGS
> below:
These seem plausible ... for commit purposes we'll want a single patch
created with "git diff", rather than two separate overlapping diffs for
each file that would be problematic to merge. That is, do "make
regen-ulps" for one configuration and move the new file into the right
place in the source tree, repeat for the other three configurations and
send the resulting "git diff" output.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com