This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/9] Add vectorized getenv for glibc use


On 05/02/2013 08:18 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:27:24PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> This adds a general "vectorized getenv" for glibc internal use.
>> The motivation is to allow subsystems to access environment variables
>> cheaply without having to rescan the environment completely.
>>
>> The dynamic linker already walks the environment to look for its
>> LD_* variables. Extend this code to look for a number of
>> pre-registered GLIBC_* variables too. This can be done at basically
>> no additional cost. The only two variables currently pre-registered
>> are for the lock elision code.
>>
>> For static builds which do not use the dynamic linker a similar
>> environment walking function is called at init time.
>>
>> The variable values are saved in a global array that can be directly
>> accessed by libc and related libraries like libpthread.
> 
> Doesn't this change behavior if environment variables are later set at
> runtime? I don't think such use should be supported anyway, but it
> seems this is an observable functional change, not just an
> optimization.

That depends on your view of the defined semantics for the new GLIBC_*
environment variables.

I for one would like to say that they are read at program startup and
never re-read. It makes the most sense for performance and make for a
simple and easy to understand runtime behaviour.

Does that make sense?

Cheers,
Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]