This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] en_CA, es_AR, es_ES: Define yesstr and nostr.
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Keld Simonsen <keld at keldix dot com>
- Cc: Petr Baudis <pasky at ucw dot cz>, libc-locales at sourceware dot org, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 10:32:50 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] en_CA, es_AR, es_ES: Define yesstr and nostr.
- References: <51619965 dot 9030600 at redhat dot com> <20130407210205 dot GX6137 at machine dot or dot cz> <5183A43F dot 7040505 at redhat dot com> <20130503134333 dot GA29133 at rap dot rap dot dk> <5183C153 dot 9070807 at redhat dot com> <20130504085302 dot GA29695 at rap dot rap dot dk>
On 05/04/2013 04:53 AM, Keld Simonsen wrote:
>>
>> It's minor work compared to coming up with the policy and providing
>> rationale for the policy.
>>
>> Have you added any guideline with rationale on the wiki so I can
>> use that to educate future contributors?
>>
>> A good place to add it would be:
>> http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Locales
>>
>> Once in place I can do a pass of all en_* to make them match.
>
> OK, I added some text on the wiki.
Keld,
Thanks. We will use this text for rationale to guide contributions.
I appreciate your support in this area.
Cheers,
Carlos.