This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [COMMITTED] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- From: Keld Simonsen <keld at keldix dot com>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: myllynen at redhat dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon at iki dot fi>, libc-locales at sourceware dot org, Petr Baudis <pasky at ucw dot cz>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 00:39:51 +0200
- Subject: Re: [COMMITTED] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- References: <514334DF dot 8000306 at redhat dot com> <51434336 dot 3020103 at redhat dot com> <5149DAAA dot 9060309 at redhat dot com> <514A3E28 dot 6040409 at redhat dot com> <514ADCFA dot 7000009 at redhat dot com> <516086E3 dot 9090402 at redhat dot com> <20130407141804 dot GA17010 at www5 dot open-std dot org> <51619247 dot 1080203 at redhat dot com> <20130407191556 dot GA1153 at www5 dot open-std dot org> <5161D6EE dot 4000409 at redhat dot com>
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 04:28:30PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 04/07/2013 03:15 PM, Keld Simonsen wrote:
> >> I don't know of any program actually using yesstr and nostr.
> >
> > Me neither. I was not aware that these keywords existed. Anyway, I
> > will write some documentation for it.
>
> I like your arguments. Could you help out the glibc community
> by writing them into the wiki so we can use them as guidance
> for future locale changes?
>
> We have some initial information here:
> http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Locales
Yes, can do.
keld